Suplementaçao da palhada de milho na alimentaçao de bovinos. 2. Concentraçao de amônia ruminal e pH ruminal
Material type: ArticleLanguage: Portuguese Description: 27(2):390-396Subject(s):- Cattle
- Animal feeding
- Consumption
- Supplements
- Ammonia
- pH
- Rumen
- Bran
- Cotton
- Cassava
- Maize
- Zea mays
- Dry matter content
- Protein content
- Brazil
- Ganado bovino
- Alimentación de los animales
- Consumo
- Suplementos
- Amoníaco
- pH
- Rumen
- Salvado
- Algodón
- Mandioca
- Maíz
- Zea mays
- Contenido de materia seca
- Contenido proteico
- Brasil
- Cassava
- Forrajes
- Yuca
- Alimentación animal
- Journal articles
- Artículos en revistas
- Forage
- Fisiología animal - Nutrición
- Animal feeding
- Animal physiology - Nutrition
- Journal article
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | CIAT Library Journal Collection | Journal Collection | c.1 | Not For Loan (Restricted Access) |
The experiment was conducted in a 4x4 Latin Square design with eight rumen fistulated Holteins-Zebu crossbred steers weighing 290 kg, to evaluate the effect of the supplementation of cornItover with urea, aerial part cassava hay and cottonseed meal on the ruminal ammonia concentration and pH. The treatments were: (A) corn stover plus urea (basal diet), (B) basal diet plus aerial part cassava hay, as a 20 percent basis of the dry matter fed (DMF), (C) basal diet plus cottonseed meal, as a 5 percent basis (DNIF), and (D) basal diet plus aerial part cassava hay (20 percent DMF plus cottonseed meal (5 percent basis DIVIF) The ruminal ammonia concentration in the treatments B, C and D were greater than in the treatment A; the treatment B did not differ from treatments C and D; and the ruminal ammonia concentration in the treatments C and D were not different. The major average ruminal ammonia concentration value was observed in the treatment D, with 117.20 mg/L, followed by treatments B, C, A, with 99.17, 90.85, and 70.04 mg/L, respectively. There was no ruminal pH difference among treatments. The average ruminal pH, for all treatments, was 6.8.(RA)